⏪Rewind: Does meal timing matter for weight loss? Original paper

In this secondary analysis, participants who ate their meals earlier and within a shorter time window consumed less energy and lost more weight than participants who ate their meals later and in longer time windows.

This Study Summary was published on December 5, 2022.

Background

Although total calorie intake relative to energy expenditure is the most important factor for losing weight, some evidence suggests that the timing of food intake has meaningful health effects. Specifically, some studies suggest that early time-restricted eating, or restricting energy intake to the morning and afternoon, may improve insulin sensitivity relative to restricting energy intake to the afternoon and evening. However, the role of food timing on weight loss outcomes is still unclear.

The study

This secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial[1] assessed how the timing of energy intake throughout the day affected dietary adherence and weight loss outcomes among participants in a weight loss program. In the original study, 188 healthy participants with a BMI of 22–27.9 reduced their calorie intake by 25% (the CR group) or maintained their habitual intake (the control group) for two years. The participants in the CR group were instructed to monitor their calorie intake daily. They were also encouraged to engage in 30 minutes per day of moderate-intensity physical activity for at least five days per week. No instruction was provided for when to eat.

The investigators assessed the following variables at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months, with additional assessments for the CR group at 6 and 18 months:

  • Percent weight change
  • Energy intake, obtained using 6-day food records
  • Mean meal shift: a measure of the irregularity of a participant’s meal times
  • 95% eating interval: the time period in which the participants ate 95% of their daily calories
  • Time to 50% of calories: the time point at which a participant ate half of their daily calories
  • Percent calorie restriction (percent CR): a measure of percentage of CR relative to baseline intake, as assessed using doubly labeled water (energy expenditure) and DXA (changes in body energy stores to obtain a true measure of energy intake)

The results

As expected, calorie restriction was the primary driver of weight change. However, the participants in the CR group with shorter 95% eating intervals were more likely to have greater calorie restriction and subsequently more weight loss.

In addition, the participants who had an earlier time to 50% of calories lost slightly more weight than those who had a later time to 50% of calories; however, this effect was nonsignificant after accounting for calorie restriction. A lesser shift in the participants’ first and last meals (i.e., more consistent breakfast and dinner times) was correlated with larger weight loss, independent of calorie restriction.

Every month we summarize over 150 of the most noteworthy health and nutrition studies. Other health categories related to this summary include:
    Try Examine+ for free to view the latest research in 25 health categories and the entire Study Summaries archive, access our Supplement Guides, and unlock the Examine Database. Plus, earn continuing education credits!

    Get free weekly updates on what’s new at Examine.

    This Study Summary was published on December 5, 2022.

    References

    1. ^James Rochon, Connie W Bales, Eric Ravussin, Leanne M Redman, John O Holloszy, Susan B Racette, Susan B Roberts, Sai Krupa Das, Sergei Romashkan, Katherine M Galan, Evan C Hadley, William E Kraus, CALERIE Study GroupDesign and conduct of the CALERIE study: comprehensive assessment of the long-term effects of reducing intake of energyJ Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.(2011 Jan)