Which “flavor” of intermittent fasting is the most effective for weight loss? Original paper

In this meta-analysis, different types of intermittent fasting diets produced similar weight loss, compared to conventional calorie-restricted diets, among participants with normal weight or overweight/obesity. Adherence to the diets was also very similar.

This Study Summary was published on January 31, 2023.

Background

Traditional weight-loss diets typically advocate consuming 500–750 calories less each day — known as calorie restriction. Recently, intermittent fasting (IF) has gained popularity as an “alternative” weight-loss method that may have additional benefits for metabolic health and longevity.[1]

However, many variations of IF exist, including alternate-day fasting (ADF), the 5:2 diet, and time-restricted eating (TRE). A comparison of the effects of these different types of IF and how they compare to calorie restriction for weight loss was needed.

The study

This meta-analysis compared the effects of different dietary regimens for weight loss in adults with normal weight or overweight/obesity. A total of 24 studies involving 1,768 participants were included in the meta-analysis.

Three IF diets and two comparator diets were included: (i) ADF/modified ADF (12 studies), (ii) the 5:2 diet (8 studies), (iii) TRE (4 studies), (iv) calorie restriction (15 studies), and (v) ad libitum eating (i.e., no dietary restriction; 9 studies). The study durations ranged from 3 to 26 weeks.

The primary outcome was weight loss. As a secondary outcome, dietary adherence was assessed for each diet.

The results

ADF/modified ADF ranked the highest as most effective for weight loss, followed by calorie restriction and then TRE.

ADF/modified ADF, the 5:2 diet, and TRE all led to a similar amount of weight loss — with a range of 0.8%–12.9% of body weight for ADF/modified ADF, 1.7%–7.9% for the 5:2 diet, and 0.9%–8.6% for TRE.

There were no differences in weight loss when comparing any of the IF diets to calorie restriction. Adherence was similar among all of the dietary regimens.

Note

Rates of adherence were not statistically analyzed in the meta-analysis but were reported for each study individually. In studies lasting 3 months or shorter, adherence was 80%–98% for ADF/modified ADF, 80%–90% for calorie restriction, 73%– 80% for the 5:2 diet, and 60%–90% for TRE.

Thus, although it appears that ADF/modified ADF and calorie restriction had the highest participant adherence, this finding needs to be more rigorously studied in the future because not all trials include these outcomes.

Every month we summarize over 150 of the most noteworthy health and nutrition studies. Other health categories related to this summary include:Try Examine+ for free to view the latest research in 25 health categories and the entire Study Summaries archive, access our Supplement Guides, and unlock the Examine Database. Plus, earn continuing education credits!

Get free weekly updates on what’s new at Examine.

This Study Summary was published on January 31, 2023.

References

  1. ^Patterson RE, Sears DDMetabolic Effects of Intermittent Fasting.Annu Rev Nutr.(2017-Aug-21)