Quick Summary

In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in participants with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, intermittent fasting improved a variety of clinical outcomes.

What was studied?

The effect of intermittent fasting on clinical endpoints in people with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

The outcomes assessed were anthropometrics (body weight, BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio), liver enzyme levels (ALT, AST), blood lipids, HOMA-IR, fasting glucose, liver fat, and liver stiffness.

Who was studied?

A total of 840 participants (average age of 42; 55% women, 45% men) with NAFLD.

How was it studied?

A meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials was performed. The type of IF intervention varied between studies and included the 5:2 diet, alternate-day fasting, time-restricted eating, and Ramadan fasting. The intervention duration ranged from 4 to 52 weeks. Most of the studies took place in Middle Eastern or Asian countries.

What were the results?

Compared to the control group, IF reduced weight (−2.66 kg/−5.86 lb), BMI, triglycerides (−21 mg/dL), insulin resistance, ALT (−6 IU/L), AST (−5 IU/L), liver fat (2 studies, both of which involved the 5:2 diet), and liver stiffness.

Anything else I need to know?

Because of the small number of studies included for each subtype of IF, it’s unclear whether some forms of IF are superior to others for certain outcomes. A second limitation is that the control group varied between studies. IF was compared to a “nonfasting” or “standard of care” group in most studies, 1 study compared IF to “caloric restriction”, and 1 study compared it to a group using the weight-loss drug liraglutide. This limitation further increases the uncertainty in whether one form of IF is better than another for a specific outcome.

This Study Summary was published on October 4, 2023.