Step it up: Can you walk your way to a longer life? Original paper

This meta-analysis of seven cohort studies found a strong inverse association between steps per day and all-cause mortality, with a linear reduction in risk from 2,700 to 17,000 steps per day.

This Study Summary was published on March 2, 2022.


Physical activity is a key component of health promotion recommendations. The World Health Organization recommends that adults perform at least 150–300 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or at least 75–150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity per week. Although there are many types of physical activity, walking is a core feature of many exercise programs because it’s free, requires no special training, and can be practiced almost anywhere. It’s commonly accepted that 10,000 steps per day is a good goal, but there is limited scientific evidence to support this recommendation. So, what is the optimal number of steps per day for health promotion?

The study

This meta-analysis of seven prospective cohort studies published after 2015 investigated the association between daily step count and all-cause mortality risk in 28,141 participants (average age range of 57–78) over 175,370 total person-years. Three studies had a follow-up duration of less than 5 years, one had 9 years, and the other three had 10 years. Additionally, six studies measured daily step count on seven consecutive days. All of the studies adjusted the results for body mass index, while six adjusted for age, alcohol intake, smoking status, and pre-existing comorbidities.

The results

There were 2,310 deaths during follow-up. In the dose-response meta-analysis, there was a strong inverse association between step count per day and all-cause mortality risk, which continued up to 17,000 steps per day. It’s unclear whether a greater number of steps leads to a greater reduction in all-cause mortality risk, since there was insufficient data on step counts above this number. Furthermore, each 1,000-step increment in daily step count was associated with a 12% lower risk of all-cause mortality. In the non-linear dose-response meta-analysis, 10,000 and 16,000 steps per day were associated with a 56% and 66% lower risk of all-cause mortality, respectively, compared to 2,700 steps per day.

Dose-response of daily step count and hazard of all-cause mortality


The dashed lines represent the upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio of all-cause mortality. This means that, if we were to construct 95% confidence intervals from samples of the population this study aims to represent, the "true" effect should lie within those intervals in 95% of those cases. The circles represent the hazard ratio for steps per day categories from each study, and the circle size indicates how much the data varied within the study — the smaller the circle, the less variation.


Since this was a meta-analysis of observational studies, the results were likely affected by residual confounding. For instance, a lower daily step count may reflect poor health status and a higher presence of comorbidities. Although six studies controlled for baseline comorbidities, these confounding effects cannot be completely controlled by statistical methods.

Due to the lower number of relevant participants, the results for 16,000 steps per day and beyond should be interpreted with caution.

The big picture

There are plenty of good reasons to get your daily step count up:

Health benefits of walking


To add further fuel to the motivational fire, increasing daily steps can significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), which are two of the most prevalent and deadly diseases worldwide.

Specifically, each 500–1,000-step increment in daily step count was associated with a 5–21% lower risk of CVD.[6][7] Also, an increase of 2,000 steps per day from any baseline amount was associated with a 25% lower risk of developing dysglycemia (i.e., elevated fasting glucose level or elevated two-hour postprandial glucose level) in healthy people, and each 2,000-step increment in daily step count was associated with a 5% lower risk of developing T2D in people with impaired glucose tolerance.[8][9]

However, the biggest and best reason for getting up and moving around more has to do with mortality. The present study was notable because it quantitatively synthesized the available evidence on daily step count and all-cause mortality, which had only been done by one other study, published in December 2021.[7]

It reported that each 1,000-step increment in daily step count was associated with a 13% lower risk of all-cause mortality. Moreover, compared to the lowest category of daily step count, the highest category was associated with a 69% lower risk of all-cause mortality. Similar inverse associations have also been reported in previous systematic reviews.[10][6]

Interestingly, accelerometer-measured step intensity, which is often measured as peak 30-minute or 1-minute cadence during the day, is not associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for daily step count.[11][12][13] This is interesting because total steps per day are highly correlated with step intensity.

These findings suggest that daily step count is more important than step intensity for health promotion, but due to a limited number of available studies, further research is needed to strengthen confidence in this association. At any rate, start stepping!

Every month we summarize over 150 of the most noteworthy health and nutrition studies. Other health categories related to this summary include:Try Examine+ for free to view the latest research in 25 health categories and the entire Study Summaries archive, access our Supplement Guides, and unlock the Examine Database. Plus, earn continuing education credits!

Get free weekly updates on what’s new at Examine.

This Study Summary was published on March 2, 2022.


  1. ^Thomas Yates, Melanie Davies, Trish Gorely, Fiona Bull, Kamlesh KhuntiEffectiveness of a pragmatic education program designed to promote walking activity in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled trialDiabetes Care.(2009 Aug)
  2. ^K-H Herzig, R Ahola, J Leppäluoto, J Jokelainen, T Jämsä, S Keinänen-KiukaanniemiLight physical activity determined by a motion sensor decreases insulin resistance, improves lipid homeostasis and reduces visceral fat in high-risk subjects: PreDiabEx study RCTInt J Obes (Lond).(2014 Aug)
  3. ^Ling-Ling Lee, Caroline A Mulvaney, Yoko Kin Yoke Wong, Edwin Sy Chan, Michael C Watson, Hui-Hsin LinWalking for hypertensionCochrane Database Syst Rev.(2021 Feb 24)
  4. ^Hsu CL, Best JR, Davis JC, Nagamatsu LS, Wang S, Boyd LA, Hsiung GR, Voss MW, Eng JJ, Liu-Ambrose TAerobic exercise promotes executive functions and impacts functional neural activity among older adults with vascular cognitive impairmentBr J Sports Med.(2018 Feb)
  5. ^Bernard P, Ninot G, Bernard PL, Picot MC, Jaussent A, Tallon G, Blain HEffects of a six-month walking intervention on depression in inactive post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled trialAging Ment Health.(2015)
  6. ^Katherine S Hall, Eric T Hyde, David R Bassett, Susan A Carlson, Mercedes R Carnethon, Ulf Ekelund, Kelly R Evenson, Deborah A Galuska, William E Kraus, I-Min Lee, Charles E Matthews, John D Omura, Amanda E Paluch, William I Thomas, Janet E FultonSystematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemiaInt J Behav Nutr Phys Act.(2020 Jun 20)
  7. ^Mingxin Sheng, Junyue Yang, Min Bao, Tianzhi Chen, Ruixue Cai, Na Zhang, Hongling Chen, Minqi Liu, Xueyu Wu, Bowen Zhang, Yiting Liu, Jianqian ChaoThe relationships between step count and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A dose-response meta-analysisJ Sport Health Sci.(2021 Dec)
  8. ^Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Cong Sun, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Angela Pezic, Alison Venn, Jonathan E Shaw, David W Dunstan, Elizabeth L M Barr, Steven N Blair, Jenny Cochrane, Paul Z Zimmet, Terence DwyerObjectively measured physical activity and the subsequent risk of incident dysglycemia: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)Diabetes Care.(2011 Jul)
  9. ^William E Kraus, Thomas Yates, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Jie-Lena Sun, Laine Thomas, John J V McMurray, M Angelyn Bethel, Rury R HolmanRelationship between baseline physical activity assessed by pedometer count and new-onset diabetes in the NAVIGATOR trialBMJ Open Diabetes Res Care.(2018 Jul 19)
  10. ^William E Kraus, Kathleen F Janz, Kenneth E Powell, Wayne W Campbell, John M Jakicic, Richard P Troiano, Kyle Sprow, Andrea Torres, Katrina L Piercy, 2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE*Daily Step Counts for Measuring Physical Activity Exposure and Its Relation to HealthMed Sci Sports Exerc.(2019 Jun)
  11. ^Pedro F Saint-Maurice, Richard P Troiano, David R Bassett Jr, Barry I Graubard, Susan A Carlson, Eric J Shiroma, Janet E Fulton, Charles E MatthewsAssociation of Daily Step Count and Step Intensity With Mortality Among US AdultsJAMA.(2020 Mar 24)
  12. ^I-Min Lee, Eric J Shiroma, Masamitsu Kamada, David R Bassett, Charles E Matthews, Julie E BuringAssociation of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older WomenJAMA Intern Med.(2019 May 29)
  13. ^Amanda E Paluch, Kelley Pettee Gabriel, Janet E Fulton, Cora E Lewis, Pamela J Schreiner, Barbara Sternfeld, Stephen Sidney, Juned Siddique, Kara M Whitaker, Mercedes R CarnethonSteps per Day and All-Cause Mortality in Middle-aged Adults in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults StudyJAMA Netw Open.(2021 Sep 1)