If you’re feeling a bit sluggish or looking to kickstart your journey to better health, you’ve likely come across any number of quick-fix detox or cleansing programs that promise to restore vitality.
Such programs can claim to cleanse your whole body or specific organs. They commonly consist of a highly restrictive diet, with a possible array of supplements. The Master Cleanse, for example, prescribes 6–12 glasses of lemonade with maple syrup and cayenne pepper as your only sustenance. According to its creator, this program promotes “the elimination of every kind of disease” and is the most successful healing diet in the world.
If you’re thinking that “every kind of disease” is conveniently vague, you have a point. In 2009, an investigative report of 15 detox-program manufacturers found that none could provide a clear-cut list of the harmful substances being eliminated, and that no two even defined “detox” the same way.
Not only are most commercial detox programs ambiguous, almost none have been tested for their safety or efficacy. Even the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health states that “there isn’t any convincing evidence that detox or cleansing programs actually remove toxins from your body or improve your health”. They also warn that “some of the products and procedures used in detox/cleansing programs may be harmful to your health” — a warning supported by case reports on kidney damage from a green-smoothie cleanse and liver failure from drinking too much “detox tea”.
Commercial detox programs claim to eliminate harmful substances that accumulate in the body, usually through highly restrictive diet protocols. Those programs, however, are largely untested for their efficacy or safety, and most can’t even agree on a definition for “detox”.
It definitely can — just not as detox companies sell it.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry defines detoxification as “the process of removing a poison or toxin or the effect of either from an area or individual”.
Medically, you need detoxification when you poison yourself with drugs, such as alcohol.
Standard medical detoxification involves shoving 25–100 grams of activated charcoal down your throat every couple of hours to prevent the swallowed chemicals from being absorbed from your gut into your bloodstream. The charcoal binds the chemicals, allowing you to poop them out.
But then, can’t you simply take activated charcoal supplements every day “just in case”? No, you can’t, or rather you shouldn’t, because activated charcoal doesn’t differentiate between friends and foes: it will bind vitamins and essential minerals just as readily as it will dangerous chemicals. Moreover, the doses in those pills are well below the 25–100 grams used medically, and activated charcoal can only bind chemicals in your intestinal tract — so not chemicals you’ve already absorbed, and not chemicals in your lungs.
Medical detoxification is warranted only in case of acute poisoning, and should be performed only under medical supervision.
The short answer is yes: your body, like that of any animal, can accumulate toxicants (poisons), including toxins (poisons produced by a living organism). This process is called bioaccumulation. Mercury, for instance, is known to accumulate in predator fish and in people who eat those fish, and even our beloved protein powders may not be entirely safe, according notably to Consumer Reports and the Clean Label Project.
Of particular concern are environmental persistent organic pollutants (POPs), a type of toxicant that accumulates in body fat. In the short term, your fat can protect the rest of your body from acute harmful effects such as metabolic and hormonal disruption. Over time, however, your fat releases POPs back into your system, causing low-level chronic exposure that has been associated with metabolic diseases.
Your body can accumulate toxins and other toxicants, notably heavy metals, such as mercury, and liposoluble chemicals, such as persistent organic pollutants (POPs).
Few studies on obesity and fat loss consider the role of POPs, yet POPs might help explain why weight loss doesn’t improve everyone’s health equally — in some people, the increased toxic load from POPs offsets the benefits of carrying around less fat. More precisely, an inefficient excretion of the POPs released when dieting may reduce health improvements, as well as increase the risk of weight regain.
Whether POP redistribution results in adverse effects in humans remains to be studied, but some data is suggestive. For example, in people whose weight loss was induced by gastric bypass surgery, higher levels of POPs in the blood was associated with lesser health improvements from weight loss. Weight loss induced by regular dieting also leads to an accelerated release of POPs from fat cells into circulation, with the increase in serum POPs being proportional to the weight loss.
Fat loss appears to accelerate the release of POPs from fat cells into circulation, and more POPs in the blood correlates with less improvement in health biomarkers. However, there is still little research on the role of POPs in obesity and weight-loss interventions.
Your body has a built-in detoxification system: your lungs and other organs work around the clock to remove harmful substances. Your liver, for instance, transforms noxious chemicals into benign substances that are excreted in the urine (via the kidneys) or feces (via the gallbladder).
There are three ways a realistic detoxification program could work:
It is wise to reduce your exposure to airborne pollutants such as smoke, smog, and chemical fumes. You don’t always get to choose where you live (e.g., rural areas tend to have less air pollution than urban areas), but you can at least reduce pollution accumulation in your home through proper air conditioning and ventilation. You can also, if you live in a smoggy area, wear a face mask — how much it’ll filter will depend on its design, including how well it fits on your face.
Pesticide residues in food are a valid concern too, though it should be noted that the Pesticide Data Program (PDP) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has consistently found that the vast majority of the food on the market contain either no detectable residues or residues below the tolerable limits set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
While the USDA does not currently test for residues of pesticides commonly used on organic foods, it does test for residues of pesticides not approved and some approved for limited application. Unsurprisingly, organic produce (notably fruit) less often have synthetic pesticide residue than conventional produce do. Trials in adults and children have shown that switching from conventional to organic produce can reduce biomarkers of organophosphate-class pesticides, which are used in conventional agriculture and may be harmful, in as little as a week. Fortunately, in the US, this class of pesticide has consistently dropped from use in favor of less acutely toxic ones since 2000.
When found, pesticide residues were similarly low in organic and conventional produce, but there is some evidence that even very low doses of pesticides might still elicit physiological effects. These effects, be they beneficial, neutral, or harmful, and be they from organic or conventional pesticides, are not well studied. So, what is a consumer to do? The practical solution is quite simple: rinsing, peeling when possible, and cooking can reduce the amount of pesticide left on your produce, whether this produce is organic or not.
(Alas, organic products are not unilaterally safer than conventional ones: a 2018 test of protein powders revealed that organic ones had about half the amount of BPA (an industrial chemical) but twice the amount of heavy metals.)
Current evidence suggests that some compounds in plant foods can upregulate your liver’s detoxification process and antioxidant activity. One such compound is the sulforaphane in broccoli and other cruciferous vegetables, as was shown in humans as well as in rats.
Fiber, especially soluble and/or fermentable, can enhance detoxification both directly and indirectly. Directly, by binding bile and its associated toxins, thus facilitating their excretion. Indirectly, by feeding the bacteria in your digestive tract, some of which create short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites that act on the liver and kidneys to increase their ability to excrete toxicants.
Sweating may help excrete heavy metals, but sauna studies are scarce and rely mostly on subjective assessments, such as questionnaires about quality of life, rather than on objective measures of toxicant burden or excretion.
As for the notion that a juice-only cleanse can shift your guts away from digestion and toward the excretion of toxicants — it is one of those catchy ideas that lack scientific backing. If you want your organs to do their best, including to rid you of toxicants, then you should not deprive them from the nutrients they need to function. That means that, rather than the occasional cleanse, what you need is a daily diet rich in varied fruits and vegetables.
Toxicants, notably heavy metals and liposoluble chemicals, can accumulate in your body. Avoid them whenever possible. You can support your inborn detoxification system by eating a diet rich in fruits and vegetables (preferably organic ones, which have less known harmful pesticide residue) and possibly by sweating. Some supplements, such as NAC, can also help.
Nutrition misinformation is everywhere. We fight it.
Enter your email address to receive a free mini-course on supplements.
Like this article, our mini-course is unbiased and 100% backed by science: you’ll learn what really works — and what’s a waste of time and money. Our course will help you deal with the misinformation out there, thus giving you a better chance to achieve your health goals!
A 2011 survey reported that 92% of naturopaths prescribed detoxification therapies, commonly as treatments for environmental exposure to toxicants. Said therapies consisted mainly in eating more “cleansing foods,” such as Brassica vegetables; eating more fruits and vegetables in general; opting for organic foods; supplementing with vitamins, minerals, and fibers; and minimizing environmental exposure to toxicants. More questionable treatments, such as homeopathy, were less common.
But what about commercial detox programs, or “cleanses”? Studies on those are scarce and, according to a review from 2015, not very convincing, as they suffer from small sample sizes, sampling bias, lack of control groups, reliance on self-report, and qualitative assessments rather than quantitative measurements. A more recent study shared these limitations: with no control group, it showed that following a detox program centered around eating a whole-food diet improved self-reported health.
The one randomized controlled trial (RCT) we could locate separated middle-aged women into three groups: Master Cleanse (MC), placebo, and control. The control group kept eating as usual, whereas the MC and placebo groups ate only 400 Calories per day. As a result, both the MC and placebo groups lost weight and showed related health improvements, with no difference between groups. In short, the “magic” was found to be in the caloric restriction only, not in the combination of lemon juice and Neera syrup (a blend of maple and palm-tree syrups designed to have high amounts of minerals and trace elements).
Finally, the one RCT on a commercial detox supplement without caloric restriction reported that this supplement didn’t have much of an effect on anything.
What little evidence there is on “cleanses” (commercial detox diets) is fraught with methodological problems. Cleanses’ short-term benefits (weight loss and related health improvements) seem to be mostly attributable to caloric restriction and placebo effects, not to special detoxification effects.
Why do fad cleanses spread through word of mouth so quickly? The answer is threefold: rapid weight loss, removal of problematic foods, and the placebo effect. This could be great … if weight loss always meant fat loss.
If you slash your caloric intake, you probably slash your carbohydrate intake, and if you slash your carbohydrate intake, you don’t replenish your glycogen stores. Not only do you lose your stored glycogen, but you lose the associated water. To store 1 gram of glycogen, you need about 3 grams of water. The average man carries 341–593 grams of glycogen in his liver and muscles, so about 1,364–2,372 grams (3–5 pounds) of glycogen+water.
Therefore, by depleting your glycogen stores, you can lose several pounds in a couple of days. And of course, less food consumed also means less food (and its associated weight) moving through your intestines.
The result? Spectacular weight loss — in the short term. But cleanses are short term, so people never get to see them fail. All they see is the spectacular weight loss; they feel better because of it, and they attribute both their weight loss and perceived better health to their cleanse. And they still do when they resume eating normally and most of the weight they lost (all the weight from glycogen+water and food-in-transit) comes rushing back.
The short-term weight loss from a cleanse can be spectacular, but most of what is lost is glycogen and water, which come rushing back when normal eating habits are resumed.
So when people feel better from a cleanse, is it just a placebo effect? Not always. People who undergo a cleanse might also feel better because they stop consuming foods that don’t agree with them. In other words, cleanses work as de facto elimination diets.
An elimination diet is a diet that removes a food or category of foods that you suspect might negatively affect your health. Some people, for instance, will stop consuming milk (or all dairy products) to see if, after a few weeks, they feel better. Sometimes, people remove many foods at once; then, after a few weeks, if they feel better, they start adding the foods back, one by one, to determine which ones are problematic.
Toxicants, notably heavy metals and liposoluble chemicals, can accumulate in your body. Avoid them whenever possible. A diet rich in protein, vegetables, and fruits will provide your organs with the nutrients they need to function optimally, and some supplements may support your liver specifically. Sweating may also help you excrete heavy metals.
As sold to the public, cleanses (detox diets) do not work. Most of their benefits — notably a rapid, but mostly short-term, weight loss — can be attributed to the drastic caloric restriction, not to detoxification. A cleanse might also help by removing foods that don’t agree with you (they work as a de facto elimination diets).
In case of acute poisoning by a toxicant, go to the hospital.
While “detox diets” are better avoided, some supplements can support liver health. Check out our Liver Health Supplement Guide to learn which supplements are backed by the evidence and which are dangerous or simply a waste of money. You’ll also find practical, specific information on dosages, combinations, etc.
- Low-fat vs. low-carb? Major study concludes: it doesn’t matter for weight loss
- Can hypothyroidism lead to fat gain?
- Does aspartame increase appetite?
- How do I stay out of "starvation mode?"
- Measuring body fat percentage: It's an accuracy thing
- Is my “slow metabolism” stalling my weight loss?
- Does eating at night make it more likely to gain weight?
- The lowdown on intermittent fasting
- I'm not too tired to stuff my face
- Does diet soda inhibit fat loss?
- Will eating breakfast keep you lean?
- How do I get a six-pack?
- Is it really that bad to skip breakfast?
- Will my breasts shrink with weight loss?
- How does protein affect weight loss?
- What should you eat for weight loss?
- 5 little-known facts about protein
- Will lifting weights convert my fat into muscle?
- How do I lose fat around my belly?
- Does high-protein intake help when dieting?
- Whey vs soy protein: which is better when losing weight?
- How important is sleep?
- I have lost significant weight and now have loose skin. How can I tighten up my skin?
- Detox diets for toxin elimination and weight management: a critical review of the evidence. J Hum Nutr Diet. (2015) Klein AV, Kiat H.
- "Green Smoothie Cleanse" Causing Acute Oxalate Nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. (2017) Makkapati S, D'Agati VD, Balsam L.
- Yogi Detox Tea: A Potential Cause of Acute Liver Failure. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. (2017) Kesavarapu K, et al.
- Expanded role of charcoal therapy in the poisoned and overdosed patient. Arch Intern Med. (1986) Park GD, et al.
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral activated charcoal in acute intoxications. Clin Pharmacokinet. (1982) Neuvonen PJ.
- Effect of activated charcoal on water-soluble vitamin content of apple juice. Journal of Food Quality. (2007) Kadakal C, et al.
- Hair-to-blood ratio and biological half-life of mercury: experimental study of methylmercury exposure through fish consumption in humans. J Toxicol Sci. (2012) Yaginuma-Sakurai K, et al.
- The cadmium content of protein drinks and nutritional powders. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. (2016) Kracker M, et al.
- Adipose Tissue as a Site of Toxin Accumulation. Compr Physiol. (2017) Jackson E, et al.
- Toxicological function of adipose tissue: focus on persistent organic pollutants. Environ Health Perspect. (2013) La Merrill M, et al.
- Persistent organic pollutants in adipose tissue should be considered in obesity research. Obes Rev. (2017) Lee YM, et al.
- Adverse effects of weight loss: Are persistent organic pollutants a potential culprit?. Diabetes Metab. (2016) Cheikh Rouhou M, et al.
- Fate and complex pathogenic effects of dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls in obese subjects before and after drastic weight loss. Environ Health Perspect. (2011) Kim MJ, et al.
- Increased plasma levels of toxic pollutants accompanying weight loss induced by hypocaloric diet or by bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. (2006) Hue O, et al.
- Detoxification pathways in the liver. J Inherit Metab Dis. (1991) Grant DM.
- Rural and Urban Differences in Air Quality, 2008-2012, and Community Drinking Water Quality, 2010-2015 - United States. MMWR Surveill Summ. (2017) Strosnider H, et al.
- Practical methods of reducing airborne contaminants in interior spaces. Arch Environ Health. (1975) McNall RE Jr.
- Effectiveness of commercial face masks to reduce personal PM exposure. Sci Total Environ. (2019) Pacitto A, et al.
- Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution. Occup Environ Med. (2018) Cherrie JW, et al.
- Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Br J Nutr. (2014) Barański M, et al.
- Organic diets significantly lower children's dietary exposure to organophosphorus pesticides. Environ Health Perspect. (2006) Lu C, et al.
- Reduction in urinary organophosphate pesticide metabolites in adults after a week-long organic diet. Environ Res. (2014) Oates L, et al.
- Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. (2012) Vandenberg LN, et al.
- Effects of food processing on pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables: a meta-analysis approach. Food Chem Toxicol. (2010) Keikotlhaile BM, Spanoghe P, Steurbaut W.
- Meta-analysis of food processing on pesticide residues in fruits. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. (2014) Liang Y, et al.
- Modulation of Metabolic Detoxification Pathways Using Foods and Food-Derived Components: A Scientific Review with Clinical Application. J Nutr Metab. (2015) Hodges RE, Minich DM.
- Antioxidant dietary approach in treatment of fatty liver: New insights and updates. World J Gastroenterol. (2017) Ferramosca A, Di Giacomo M, Zara V.
- Sulforaphane-rich broccoli sprout extract improves hepatic abnormalities in male subjects. World J Gastroenterol. (2015) Kikuchi M, et al.
- Broccoli sprout extract induces detoxification-related gene expression and attenuates acute liver injury. World J Gastroenterol. (2015) Yoshida K, et al.
- The Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Interplay between Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Genetic Background. Gastroenterol Res Pract. (2016) Yu J, et al.
- The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. (2013) den Besten G, et al.
- Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury in sweat: a systematic review. J Environ Public Health. (2012) Sears ME, Kerr KJ, Bray RI.
- Clinical Effects of Regular Dry Sauna Bathing: A Systematic Review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2018) Hussain J, Cohen M.
- Detoxification in naturopathic medicine: a survey. J Altern Complement Med. (2011) Allen J, et al.
- Effects of the Dietary Detoxification Program on Serum γ-glutamyltransferase, Anthropometric Data and Metabolic Biomarkers in Adults. J Lifestyle Med. (2016) Kim JA, Kim JY, Kang SW.
- Lemon detox diet reduced body fat, insulin resistance, and serum hs-CRP level without hematological changes in overweight Korean women. Nutr Res. (2015) Kim MJ, et al.
- A Purported Detoxification Supplement Does Not Improve Body Composition, Waist Circumference, Blood Markers, or Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Healthy Adult Females. J Diet Suppl. (2018) Tinsley G, et al.
- Liver glycogen content in man in the postabsorptive state. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. (1973) Nilsson LH.
- Relationship between muscle water and glycogen recovery after prolonged exercise in the heat in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2015) Fernández-Elías VE, et al.
- Glycogen storage: illusions of easy weight loss, excessive weight regain, and distortions in estimates of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. (1992) Kreitzman SN, Coxon AY, Szaz KF.