Study under review: Physiological responses to maximal eating in men
Obesity is the result of a chronic positive energy balance, in which more energy is absorbed than expended. Part of the problem with the current approach to mitigating obesity, besides the fact that it is a multifactorial disease, is determining why some people, but not all, overeat. Although it is pretty well agreed upon that over consumption of food is the result of many factors, studies have shown that people normally tend to compensate for overfeeding periods and lose the weight gained afterward in an unconscious manner. Understanding the differences between people who can and people who can’t compensate requires a careful examination of the physiology of overfeeding.
There have been many studies over the years testing different types of diets for weight loss, both under very controlled conditions and under free-living scenarios. However, the physiological response to maximal overfeeding (i.e. eating as much as possible) has received comparably less attention. Moreover, most of the previous long-term overfeeding studies have analyzed the effects of prescribed overfeeding, in which participants are given a specific energy intake goal that is above their energy requirements. So, it is not known precisely how the body deals with maximal eating and the physiological responses to it.
The authors of this study wanted to compare and characterize the acute participant response to two types of feedings: participants eating until they were comfortably full and participants eating as much as they possibly could.
Obesity results from the chronic overconsumption of calories, which is caused by several environmental factors. However, normal weight participants appear to compensate for overfeeding, so it is not completely understood why some people do not compensate for an increase in energy intake over time. Moreover, the physiological response to eating as much as possible has not been yet determined.
Other Articles in Issue #70 (August 2020)
Deep Dive: Does trimming the saturated fat from your diet actually lower heart disease risk?
According to the latest Cochrane review exploring the matter: yes, especially when they're replaced with PUFAs.
NERD Mini: Chewing the (saturated) fat
Here are some takehomes from a recent debate exploring whether public health guidelines should push people to lower saturated fat intake as much as possible.
Green tea for weight loss: does it really work?
Betteridge's law of headlines doesn't hold here!
Tortoise and the hare: Comparing the effects of weight loss speed
This meta-analysis found that gradual weight loss led to better body composition outcomes, at least in the short term.
Safety Spotlight: Higher-dose vitamin D supplementation may weaken muscles in postmenopausal women
A 2018 study found that vitamin D supplementation weakened women's muscles. A recent follow-up explored why this may have happened.
Deep Dive: Subtle smarts from polyphenols for middle-aged adults
A recent meta-analysis suggests that polyphenols may impact some aspects of cognition in the short term. But that conclusion paints a picture with a really broad brush.
NERD Mini: How much do nutrition professionals use the glycemic index?
A recent survey explored how much U.S. nutrition professionals use the glycemic index to educate their clients and patients. We summarize some of the key findings here.
NERD Nulls: May-June 2020
The absence of evidence is sometimes evidence of absence!