Examine publishes rigorous, unbiased analysis of the latest and most important nutrition and supplementation studies each month, available to all Examine Members. Click here to learn more or log in.
Study under review: The effect of diet, exercise, and lifestyle intervention on childhood obesity: A network meta-analysis
Introduction
Body mass index (BMI) is used to define childhood overweight and obesity. However, BMI works a little differently in children than in adults. In adults, BMI is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. In comparison, the status of a child’s weight is determined using an age- and gender-specific percentile for BMI (referred to as BMI-for-age) because child body composition varies by age and sex. Overweight for a child is defined[1] as a BMI-for-age equal to or greater than the 85th percentile and less than the 95th percentile. Obesity for a child is defined as a BMI-for-age equal to or greater than the 95th percentile. The details of BMI-for-age for both boys and girls is shown in Figure 1.

Reference: CDC. 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: Methods and Development. 2002 May.
The World Health Organization reports that childhood obesity has been steadily increasing throughout the world. In 2019, 38 million children younger than 5 years old were overweight or obese. Childhood overweight and obesity [2]adversely affect[2] many organ systems and can lead to complications, including high blood pressure, adverse changes in blood lipid levels, insulin resistance, fatty liver disease, physical limitations, and psychosocial difficulties. This is why it is imperative to find effective ways to prevent and reverse childhood overweight and obesity.
Several [3]studies have investigated[3] the beneficial effects of individual interventions such as diet, exercise, and lifestyle to control childhood overweight and obesity. However, there are no systematic reviews that rank interventions to determine which work best for controlling childhood overweight and obesity. Through the use of a network meta-analysis, this study was designed to compare and evaluate the results of pertinent interventions in order to identify the most effective method(s) of intervention to control childhood overweight and obesity.
The prevalence and consequences associated with childhood overweight and obesity make these conditions a serious issue that needs to be addressed. Although there are studies that have examined the beneficial effects of various interventions individually, there are no systematic reviews that compare the efficacy of several interventions or combinations of interventions (e.g., diet, exercise, lifestyle, multicomponent) both with and without parental involvement. The researchers conducting this study used a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these interventions both with and without parental involvement.
What was studied?
What were the findings?
The bigger picture
Frequently asked questions
What should I know?
Other Articles in Issue #75 (January 2021)
-
Safety Spotlight: Women and creatine
The effects of creatine are quite well studied, but its sex-specific safety profile hasn't been. Besides some non-serious side effects, creatine seems safe for women, but more work needs to understand creatine's effects during pregnancy.
-
The effects of increased protein intake on overall energy intake in older adults
Boosting protein intake may help stave off the loss of muscle strength and function that can come with age. But does increasing protein affect energy intake in older adults as well? We cover a recent meta-analysis that explored this question.
-
Sugar Wars, Episode 6: The Return of the Fructose
How does fructose affect cardiometabolic risk markers calorie-for-calorie compared to glucose or sucrose? This recent meta-analysis aimed to find out.
-
Deep Dive: Supplementing for senior strength and size in the context of sarcopenia
This systematic review and meta-analysis explored what supplements can stave off the loss of muscle function that comes with aging. However, the way it categorized the studies it used, along with the overall low quality of those studies, makes its conclusions seem a bit... weak.
-
Interview: Cyriac Abby Philips, MBBS, MD, DM (Hepatology)
In this interview, we pick Dr. Philips' brain about the basics of Ayurveda, its safety, and the story behind a recently retracted paper he was involved with detailing a case of acute liver failure and death in a patient who was taking supplements.
-
Deep Dive: Do Low-Carb Diets Stoke the Metabolic Fire?
This meta-analysis concluded that longer-term low-carb dieters feel the metabolic burn, but some methodological concerns may douse this flame a bit.
-
Deep Dive: Evaluating the relationship between training status and optimal protein intake
According to this recent meta-analysis, whether or not more protein is better for lean body mass may come down to resistance training status.