Examine.com Blog - Interesting Revelations on Supplements

Posted by KamalPatel on Jan 27, 2015

The Examine.com editors have finished the entry on Vitamin B3. Commonly called niacin, this essential vitamin is at the center of a great debate.

Supplementing niacin increases HDL cholesterol (the ‘good’ cholesterol) and reduces triglycerides. It causes a significant increase in HDL, to the point where supplementing niacin should greatly reduce the risk of coronary artery disease. Yet, all the evidence points to the fact that niacin supplementation does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. At the very center of the debate lies one question: why?

Niacin’s effects on glucose metabolism may be the reason such significant biomarker improvements do not result in an actual reduced disease risk. When supplemented over a long period of time, niacin increases insulin resistance. Though not everyone experiences this side effect, it occurs frequently enough to be a concern, especially since researchers are still trying to figure out why this effect occurs.

An alternate form of niacin called nicotinamide (the other vitamin B3 vitamer) doesn’t affect cholesterol or insulin resistance, but preliminary evidence suggests it provides benefits for mitochondrial function and longevity after supplementation.

Many more studies are needed on both B3 vitamers before they can be recommended for supplementation. Niacin is a promising cardioprotective supplement, provided the major side effect of increased insulin resistance is thoroughly researched. A stack, or combination of supplements, designed to counteract niacin’s side effects, could make it an effective supplementation option in the future. Nicotinamide requires specific research on oral supplementation, but initial evidence is promising.

See the Human Effect Matrix for Vitamin B3

Posted by Sol on Jan 21, 2015

Any diet promising a quick fix is always too good to be true. Good health takes time and dedication. Still, that doesn’t stop fad diets and their marketers from gumming up the airways with advertisements. One kind of fad diet always makes the rounds this time of year: the cleanse, or “detox” diet.

What exactly is a cleanse?

You’ll be hard-pressed to find a specific definition for either of these interchangeable terms. Presumably, the goal of a cleanse is to eliminate harmful substances from the body by “flushing” them out through a combination of caloric restriction and a liquid-only diet. Many cleanses are supposedly aimed at specific body parts, whether it’s a liver cleanse, a colon cleanse, or the almighty Master Cleanse.

Cleanses and detox diets often involve strict food limitations, usually allowing only fruit and vegetable juice, or other drinks. The master cleanse, for example, prescribes a daily six to twelve glasses of lemonade containing maple syrup and cayenne pepper. Supposedly, this concoction will remove toxins from the body, and according to its creator, support the “elimination of every kind of disease.”

While minor differences might differentiate one fad cleanse or detox diet from another, no specific one is worth dissecting in detail, since a new one will be around the corner, claiming to be more effective than the others. In simple terms, detox and cleanses hinge on the premise that the human body accumulates “toxins” as a result of exposure to pesticides, pollutants, food additives, or simply from inadequate flushing of metabolic waste.

Does the body need cleansing?

It is important to understand, however, that the human body is remarkably resilient. The liver, kidneys, lungs, and several other organs work around the clock to remove harmful substances and excrete waste products of metabolism. They don’t need any help from pepper-infused lemonade. Moreover, there is evidence that commercial detox supplements are not based on facts. A 2009 investigation found that not a single company behind 15 commercial cleanses could name the toxins targeted by their treatment, agree on the definition of the word ‘detox’, or even supply evidence that their products work.

The fact that no company can name the toxin their product targets reveals just how little of an effect cleanses have. To scientifically determine the effectiveness of a treatment, the toxin being investigated first needs to be identified in order to accurately measure its accumulation in the body. Then, researchers would investigate the effects of pharmaceuticals or supplements on the toxin. Finally, scientists would begin to explore a hypothesis for why the toxin is affected by a particular drug or supplement. For example, scientists researching the effects of organochlorine pesticides, which are known to accumulate in mammals, not only know the name of the toxin they are researching, but they have also determined that accumulation can be limited by the pharmaceutical Orlistat. In fact, the mechanism behind Orlistat’s effect on organochlorine is largely understood: normally, organochlorine pesticides can move between the liver and intestines. Orlistat confines the toxins to the intestines, where they are removed as waste.

This is not to say that the human body does not accumulate low levels of toxicants, such as heavy metals or certain fat soluble substances. Rather, the takeaway is that detox diets or cleanses have no demonstrable effect on the removal or excretion of these toxicants.

How can you explain apparent cleanse benefits?

Fad cleanses often spread through word-of-mouth despite their apparent lack of beneficial health effects. Since a cleanse involves caloric restriction, temporary weight loss often results. This is a result of glycogen loss from the liver and muscles, not fat loss. Under caloric restriction, the body’s glycogen stores can easily be depleted in 24-48 hours, resulting in a weight loss of several pounds (both from the glycogen burnt, and the water weight associated with glycogen storage). Once a regular eating schedule is resumed, however, the glycogen and water come rushing back. Nevertheless, this temporary weight loss leads a lot of people to believe the cleanse they just completed had some beneficial health effects.

Not to mention - most people eat poorly. A cleanse usually brings with it vegetable and fruit consumption, which brings a host of nutrients their regular diet is likely severely lacking in.

Instead of doing a cleanse for a New Year’s resolution, focus on long-term sustainable health habits, like eating nutritious food on a daily basis. Leafy greens, ample protein, and food chock-full of vitamins is not just tastier than a cleanse, but will actually benefit your body too.

Posted by Sol on Jan 15, 2015

Our third issue of the Examine.com Research Digest is out! With studies ranging from heart benefits of alcohol, to weight gain and how marijuana use affects your brain, this month’s ERD promises the latest in nutrition and supplement research over the past few weeks.

January’s sneak peek includes an investigation on the progression of carbs and saturated fat intakes - read it now.

And if you’re serious about nutrition, subscribe now!

Posted by KamalPatel on Dec 17, 2014

There's nothing more important to us than being objective.

Here's our recently-formalized disclosure:

Examine.com is an unbiased nutrition and supplement resource. We are not influenced by commercial interests, product manufacturers, or any other organization, and we will not advertise products or brands. Examine.com does not accept donations, third-party funding, or sponsorship of any kind. One hundred percent of our revenue is generated through our three products: the Examine.com Research Digest, Supplement-Goals Reference, and the Supplement Stack Guides.

So why exactly are we so obsessive about staying objective?

We've been approached by a variety of corporations and other organizations during the last four years, who ask if they can help fund us, provide us with products, and a variety of other requests. Every single time, we say no.

They aren't evil by any stretch of the imagination. If you feel like you have a product or cause that can help human health, why not advocate for it?

But judging products or taking a stance simply isn't what we do.

Instead, we provide as much information as possible, summarizing otherwise complex findings. We don't judge particular branded products, and the data on our site changes as the research changes.

There are plenty of experts on the web, and a thousand times as many so-called experts. Our goal is to provide you with verifiable knowledge, to help you develop your own expertise.

Posted by KamalPatel on Dec 9, 2014

If you look up the term "antioxidant" on pubmed, you get around 423,000 papers. And that number will continue to climb each week.

So let's say you just want to know whether to take antioxidants or not. What does the most recent research say, and how does it apply to you? Here are a couple options:

1) Go straight to the peer-reviewed articles

If you have a few dozen hours free and some background in biochem, physiology, and epidemiology, as well as full-text access to medical journals, then you may be able to get some insight.

But academic writing is not so fun to read. To put it mildly. Forget melatonin, try reading one whole issue of a journal from front to back.

2) Check out an issue of ERD

Or you could just subscribe to the Examine.com Research Digest.

Our second monthly issue just came out, and it covers some of the most important trials from the past few weeks. The trials explore the impact of antioxidants on muscle, the latest on the microbiome, and a variety of other highly applicable topics.

We have around a dozen researchers and physicians check the reviews, and try our hardest to give an objective perspective. Hundreds upon hundreds of hours go into each issue.

Reading ERD will put you several steps ahead of most anyone interested in nutrition and supplementation. Not even nutrition researchers (and certainly not physicians) have the time to find the most important trials each month, read the full text, and get the perspective of a variety of experts on each one.

And knowledge is power -- not just for your own health, but for your friends and family.

We genuinely enjoy what we do. And we aim to make accessible what was formerly locked in ivory towers in dry, inacessible language. Try out an issue and see if it piques your curiosity.

Posted by KamalPatel on Dec 3, 2014

Today, Examine.com presents a page on L-alanyl-L-glutamine, a dipeptide molecule similar to alanine and glutamine, also known by its brand name, Sustamine.

Dipeptides are made up of two amino acids. They are sometimes referred to as nature’s prodrug. A prodrug is a compound that becomes active when it is metabolized by the body. In a way, L-alanyl-L-glutamine is a prodrug for glutamine.

Glutamine is an amino acid that plays a critical role in muscle function and development. However, it’s not a very useful supplement. After supplementation, glutamine ends up predominantly in the intestines and liver, which provide the body with glutamine on an as-needed basis. This prevents glutamine from having any performance-enhancing or muscle-building effects. It may, however, be a useful supplement for intestinal health and muscular endurance.

L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine is claimed to allow glutamine to get past the liver and intestines, since its dipeptide structure is thought to act like a prodrug. Unfortunately, current evidence is not promising, suggesting that supplementing L-alanyl-L-glutamine does not provide more benefits than glutamine itself.

L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine is very water-soluble, which means it may play a promising role in IV nutrition. Plus, it’s way easier to dissolve in a drink, so it may be gentler on the digestive system, which is important for endurance athletes.

L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine is a more water-soluble glutamine. If you’re thinking of supplementing glutamine for intestinal health or endurance exercise, L-alanyl-L-glutamine may be a better option, since the increased water solubility poses a lower risk for intestinal distress.

Posted by Sol on Nov 27, 2014

The Examine.com editors have finished the page on bioactive compounds in chocolate. Collectively, these molecules are called Cocoa Extract.

Not all of these molecules are unique to chocolate. The compound epicatechin, for example, is also found in prunes. Procyanidin B2 is found in Grape Seed Extract and Pycnogenol.

Most of the interest in cocoa extract is due to its high (-)-epicatechin content. Low doses of (-)-epicatechin are associated with benefits related to blood flow, due to improved nitric oxide (NO) synthesis.

Unlike most pre-workout supplements, which provide L-Arginine in an effort to unreliably increase nitric oxide, (-)-epicatechin works at the rate-limiting step of NO production by stimulating the enzyme that produces it. This results in improved blood flow to the brain and reduced blood pressure. This effect may be able to reduce the rate of cognitive decline in older adults. One study even found healthy people supplementing (-)-epicatechin experienced a protective effect in the kidneys due to improved oxygenation.

Improving nitric oxide synthesis also improves insulin signaling. This is why low doses of (-)-epicatechin improve insulin sensitivity, particularly in muscle tissue. Evidence from animal studies suggests this may improve physical performance and facilitate effective energy use in muscles.

Eating dark chocolate (50 – 85% cocoa), baker’s chocolate, and semisweet chocolate provides a low dose of (-)-epicatechin and results in the same effects as cocoa extract supplementation. About 25-40 grams of chocolate is equivalent to the standard (-)-epicatechin dose. This is about 200 calories of chocolate. The more cocoa chocolate contains, by weight, the less is needed to achieve the same (-)-epicatechin dose. White and milk chocolate do not contain enough catechins to provide the health benefits associated with dark chocolate.

Posted by Sol on Nov 9, 2014

We're going to keep this short and sweet.

Over 1250 people have already bought the Examine.com Research Digest, and they are absolutely loving all they’ve learned in just the first issue. Just search on twitter and see the overwhelmingly positive response.

With that said - the price goes up 20% once the clock hits midnight PST.

If you’re a professional, this saves you time and money, and it keeps you on top of the latest research.

Get it now: Examine.com Research Digest

Still not convinced? We're so confident that ERD will bring massive value to your knowledge and career that we have a no questions asked 30 day money back guarantee.

Want a quick sneak peek? Click here see our sample review - "Umami appetizers backed by science".

Remember - the sale ends tonight. Get the Examine.com Research Digest.

Posted by Sol on Nov 5, 2014

In recent years we’ve seen some terrible headlines:

  • "High protein diet is as bad as smoking"
  • "Fish oil causes prostate cancer."
  • "Vitamin D is useless."

There's a giant problem out there in health and fitness right now - the immense gap between the research and the practitioner.

Who can you trust?

At the same time, people are busier than ever, and keeping abreast of the latest scientific research is extremely difficult.

This is why we created the Examine.com Research Digest - ERD.

What is ERD exactly? It's a monthly digest which helps you easily digest new and relevant research.

Each month ERD scours over 8 recent nutrition and supplement studies, breaks them down and delivers them to you in an easy to follow format

This is immensely valuable because rather than wasting your time and focusing the minutiae, we take a step back, look at the big picture, and tell you what’s important.

You could say "It's the smartest way to stay on top of the latest nutrition research."

Best of all, ERD has an all-star panel who cover the 8 studies each month. With 15 active contributors to ERD, we cover the research from all angles. When you read our analysis, you'll know you're getting the full picture.

For the next few days, membership to ERD will be available at a special 20% off introductory sale. By subscribing to ERD you get:

  • 8 in-depth reviews on the latest nutrition research
  • An op-ed (a fantastic piece of Dr. Yoni Freedhoff for the first issue)
  • Interviews with notable influencers in the field
  • A monthly Q&A with a researcher.

Finally, you also get access to a member’s only private forum where you can discuss our reviews and analysis.

Put it all together, and the Examine.com Research Digest is the perfect tool for professional development while being a massive time saver.

If you are serious about nutrition, ERD is a must-have. Act now, join ERD, and save 20%.

Posted by Sol on Oct 29, 2014

We’ve been analyzing scientific research in supplementation and nutrition for over 3.5 years now. We’ve had over a dozen people with varied backgrounds from pharmD to PhD to double PHDs/MDs who have researched, submitted, and reviewed our work.

And you know what we’ve found?

No one man or woman can do it alone.

You need a team. You need a review process. You need a panel of experts.

And that’s what makes ERD (Examine.com Research Digest) so powerful. And why it’s a must have for anyone who takes their nutrition seriously.

Every month, we will tackle 6-8 recent nutrition/supplement studies. We will analyze them. We will look at their study design. What the results were. What questions were answered, and what new questions arise. And most importantly: how all this research applies in the big picture (you know - making it applicable).

We're bridging the gap between the practitioner and the research.

But when you read it, you’ll be reading something that over a dozen people will have looked over.

First you’ll have our primary researchers. These are people who have experience conducting research. They’ll go in, look at the study, and break it down. They’ll bring about all the salient points - everything you need to know.

Next you’ll have the editors. These are people who’ve been part of peer-review (which is basically what we’ve built!) They’ll pore over every citation, every single claim. They’ll make sure the analysis stands up to the most intense scrutiny.

And finally, we’ll have our reviewers. These are leaders who have decades of experience to draw from, both theoretical and practical. They’ll look over the reviews to make sure it all make sense.

Five researchers. Four editors. Six reviewers. 15 people coming together to make sense of nutrition research.

Best of all - there’s no single field of study that everyone comes from. RDs, PhDs, pharmDs, MDs - you’ll know that each review has gone through review and revision from a wide breadth of people.

You’ll know that what you’re reading is the result of a council of brilliant minds, all coming together to make sure you’re kept abreast with the latest research.

One last thing...

If you're interested, you need to get on the ERD Earlybird Waitlist.

You’ll get access to ERD 24 hours before we open it up to our 50,000+ Examine.com Insiders, to our 30,000+ Facebook Fans, and to our 25,000+ visitors/day to Examine.com.

The first 350 people to buy ERD will get it at an exclusive price that won’t be made available ever again.

Click here to get on the ERD Earlybird Waitlist!

ERD is going to be a game changer.